Clay Thompson vs Shotaro Goto Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W L W L W L L L
Form
L W L L W W L L W LHead-2-Head: Thompson 1 - 0 Goto
They have played 2 sets in total, with Thompson winning 2 and Goto winning 0. The last match between Thompson and Goto was at the USA F28, 28-09-2015, Second, Hard with Clay Thompson getting the victory 6-3 6-2.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Clay Thompson | 1 |
| Shotaro Goto | 0 |
USA F28(28-09-2015)
6
3
6
2
| Thompson | Stats | Goto |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| Ret. | Ranking | Ret. |
| 408 | Highest Rank | 843 |
| 32 | Age | 30 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 1 | Titles | 0 |
| 58% (90-66) | Career Total W/L | 50% (59-60) |
| $920 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Kartal VS Svitolina PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Rinderknech VS Ruud PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-2 |
Stats 
Clay Thompson
Player
Shotaro Goto
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve %
59%
(
27 of
46)
7
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
0
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
57
Total Points Won
39
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 5 |
| 7 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 1:7:0 | Average Match Time | 1:7:0 |
| 66% (33/50) | 1st Serve % | 59% (27/46) |
| 76% (25/33) | 1st Serve Win % | 48% (13/27) |
| 53% (9/17) | 2nd Serve Win % | 53% (10/19) |
| 80% (4/5) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 33% (1/3) |
| 50% (23/46) | Return Points Win % | 32% (16/50) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Clay Thompson Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Mackenzie Mcdonald
Player
Clay Thompson
59%
(
27 of
46)
1st Serve %
59%
(
32 of
54)
3
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
4
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
14 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
61
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Evan King
Player
Clay Thompson
58%
(
36 of
62)
1st Serve %
60%
(
45 of
75)
5
Aces
10
3
Double Faults
9
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
31 of
45)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
31%
(
19 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
31 of
75)
74
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 | 7-5 6-7(5) 7-6(5) | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Clay Thompson
Player
Ricardo Hocevar
69%
(
43 of
62)
1st Serve %
60%
(
30 of
50)
15
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
32%
(
6 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
39%
(
24 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
67
Total Points Won
45
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Evan Zhu
Player
Clay Thompson
60%
(
52 of
87)
1st Serve %
47%
(
30 of
64)
2
Aces
8
6
Double Faults
7
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
23 of
30)
54%
(
19 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
37%
(
32 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
22 of
64)
77
Total Points Won
74
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Clay Thompson
Player
Ryoto Tachi
55%
(
38 of
69)
1st Serve %
63%
(
42 of
67)
8
Aces
1
12
Double Faults
4
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
26 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
67)
74
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Bjorn Fratangelo
Player
Clay Thompson
66%
(
41 of
62)
1st Serve %
66%
(
42 of
64)
2
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
5
85%
(
35 of
41)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
27%
(
17 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
64)
72
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Clay Thompson
Player
John Lamble
67%
(
43 of
64)
1st Serve %
55%
(
28 of
51)
4
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
24 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
23 of
51)
63
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Marinko Matosevic
Player
Clay Thompson
52%
(
46 of
89)
1st Serve %
64%
(
58 of
90)
13
Aces
12
7
Double Faults
5
78%
(
36 of
46)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
44 of
58)
65%
(
28 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
28%
(
25 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
30 of
90)
94
Total Points Won
85
|
7-6(3) 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Clay Thompson
Player
Beck Pennington
55%
(
29 of
53)
1st Serve %
52%
(
30 of
58)
6
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
11
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
20 of
30)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
28%
(
15 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
58)
65
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Shotaro Goto Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-5 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 4-6 6-0 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 4-6 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-4 7-5 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Germain Gigounon
Player
Shotaro Goto
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve %
78%
(
36 of
46)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
60%
(
21 of
35)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
41%
(
21 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
58
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58% (90/66) | Win/Loss | 50% (59/60) |
| 57% (205/154) | Sets Win/Loss | 51% (141/136) |
| 53% (1833/1628) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (1253/1218) |
| 57% (72/54) | Hard Win/Loss | 49% (45/46) |
| 57% (4/3) | Clay Win/Loss | 53% (10/9) |
| 64% (14/8) | Indoor Hard W/L | 44% (4/5) |
| 0% (0/1) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.38 | Aces Per Game | 0.01 |
| 638 | Aces Total | 10 |
| 0.23 | Double Faults Per Game | 0 |
| 384 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 537.4 | Average Opponent Rank | 345.97 |
| 59% (3523/5924) | 1st Serve % | 67% (321/481) |
| 73% (2567/3523) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (194/321) |
| 50% (1204/2401) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (77/160) |
| 42% (202/481) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 39% (23/59) |
| 36% (2114/5839) | Return Points Win % | 42% (203/486) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 20% (1/4) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 53% (27/24) | Challenger W/L | 50% (1/1) |
| 63% (62/37) | Futures W/L | 50% (58/59) |
| 57% (88/154) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 49% (58/118) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 48% (25/52) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 59% (16/27) |
| 45% (21/47) | Deciding Set Win % | 39% (15/38) |
| 86% (93/80) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 80% (64/51) |
| 14% (93/13) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 20% (64/13) |
| 14% (63/9) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 15% (55/8) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
